Duty of Good Faith to Complete Contracts #349

Jul 01, 2002

CATEGORY:   
TAGS:      

PRINT


By Gerry Neely
B.A. LL.B

Lawyers used to feel they could confidently advise clients that, if the buyers failed to pay on the closing dates or sellers failed to deliver executed conveyancing documents by those dates, the contract could be terminated by the innocent party because of the "time is of the essence" clause. However, over the past two decades the judges in several cases have accepted the argument that there is an implied duty on the part of sellers and buyers to act in good faith to complete contracts.

Examples include an Ontario case where a document prepared by the buyer's lawyer was not in registrable form. This wasn't discovered until late in the day and, by the time it had been corrected and delivered to the seller, the registry was closed. When the seller refused to close, the judge held that the seller was not entitled to use the "time is of the essence" clause to terminate the contract because he had breached his duty to act in good faith. 1

In another Ontario case, a buyer refused to complete because of a shortfall of 0.16 per cent of the total property the seller had agreed to sell and convey. The court refused to allow this repudiation on the basis that the parties to the contract owed each other a duty to "act reasonably and in good faith and not in a capricious or arbitrary manner." 2

Several Alberta and BC cases have reached the same results on conduct described as "unjust and inequitable." 3, 4.

These decisions mean that a lawyer advising a client cannot assume that a court will automatically allow the client to exercise the contractual right the client has to terminate the contract.

  1. Leung v. Leung, [1990] 75 O.R. (2d ), p. 786.
  2. LeMesurier v. Andrus, [1986] 54 O.R. (2d), 1(C.A.).
  3. Landbank Minerals Ltd. v. Wesgeo Enterprises Ltd., [1981] 5 W.W.R. p. 524.
  4. Salama Enterprises (1988) Inc. v. Grewal, [1992] 90 D.L.R. (4th), p. 146.




To subscribe to receive BCREA publications such as this one, or to update your email address or current subscriptions, click here.

Without limiting the Terms of Use applicable to your use of BCREA's website and the information contained thereon, the information contained in BCREA’s Legally Speaking publications is prepared by external third-party contributors and provided for general informational purposes only. The information in BCREA’s Legally Speaking publications should not be considered legal advice, and BCREA does not intend for it to amount to advice on which you should rely. You should not, in any circumstances, rely on the legal information without first consulting with your lawyer about its accuracy and applicability. BCREA makes no representation about and has no responsibility to you or any other person for the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of the information supplied by any external third-party contributors.

What we do



Popular tags within Legally Speaking



Popular posts from BCREA

  • Housing Market Update – February 2024
    Feb 16, 2024
  • Mortgage Rate Forecast
    Dec 13, 2023