Issue 1: Establish a Regional Housing Policy Roundtable
Resources:
The Problem:
Municipal governments play a critical role in housing supply, yet housing challenges do not stop at municipal boundaries. Residents often live, work, study, and access services across regional communities, and housing pressures tend to be regional.
There are few formal mechanisms for ongoing regional collaboration with those directly involved in delivering housing, and the housing sector faces variability across municipal zoning bylaws, creating inconsistency, duplication, and unintended barriers to new housing. However, if housing providers could scale across multiple communities under consistent rules, those efficiencies would translate directly into lower per-unit costs, making homes more affordable for buyers and renters.
Local housing policy decisionmakers would benefit from a more structured, ongoing forum for regional collaboration. Mayors and councillors will continue to be asked to make consequential decisions on housing supply, and these decisions should be informed by experts working directly across the housing continuum.
Without a regional forum for practical, evidence-based discussion, housing policy risks becoming fragmented across neighbouring communities. A lack of coordination can make it harder to deliver the right housing forms in the right places align infrastructure with growth, and build complete communities.
Recommendation:
BC REALTORS® recommend that municipal candidates support the creation of a regional housing policy roundtable after the 2026 local government elections.
A regional housing policy roundtable would bring together stakeholders and experts to identify barriers and develop practical, regionally appropriate housing solutions. The roundtable would not replace council decision-making authority. Rather, it would provide a structured advisory forum to help elected officials better understand housing conditions, pressure-test potential policy changes, and improve coordination across neighbouring communities.
The roundtable should be designed to remain practical, focused, and manageable. A suggested structure could include:
- Ten to 15 core members representing a balanced cross-section of the regional housing continuum.
- Quarterly meetings, with the ability to convene additional topic-specific sessions when urgent issues arise.
- A short annual public report summarizing key housing barriers, opportunities, and recommended actions for participating governments.
This flexible structure would allow the roundtable to remain general enough for any region in BC while still being adaptable to local needs.
Purpose of the Roundtable:
The purpose of the roundtable would be to:
- Identify regional housing barriers affecting supply, affordability, rental availability, homeownership, infrastructure, development approvals, and housing choice.
- Improve coordination between neighbouring municipalities, regional districts, First Nations and Indigenous housing providers, market and non-market housing expertise, and other rotating subject matter experts as needed.
- Pressure-test proposed local housing policies before implementation to identify unintended consequences and practical challenges.
- Support evidence-based decision-making by bringing together data, market insights, community perspectives, and front-line housing expertise.
- Ensure housing policies reflect local conditions, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all approach.
- Create a regular forum for dialogue among groups that often work on housing issues separately but are affected by one another’s decisions.
Potential Areas of Focus:
In addition to region-specific housing topics, a regional housing policy roundtable could advise on issues such as:
- Scaling prefabricated housing.
- Alignment of zoning and permitting processes.
- Local zoning and opportunities for gentle density through missing middle housing.
- Infrastructure constraints affecting housing supply.
- Regional growth planning and transportation connections.
- Rental housing supply and purpose-built rental feasibility.
- Non-market and supportive housing partnerships.
- Development cost charges, amenity contributions, and other local government finance tools.
- Alignment between provincial housing legislation and local implementation.
No single municipality can solve its housing crisis alone. Housing policy works best when it is coordinated, evidence-based, and informed by those working across the housing continuum.
Select another issue
Issue 2: Unlock Local Prefabricated Housing Potential
Resources:
The Problem:
As voters consider local leadership in the upcoming municipal elections, candidates should be prepared to explain how they will use municipal tools to support more housing options, for more people, in more places. With average provincial home prices now exceeding $925,000, homeownership is beyond the reach of many British Columbians. Improving housing attainability and supporting healthy community growth will require all levels of government to prioritize increasing housing supply and doubling the rate of home completions. This will require innovative methods and approaches.
Prefabricated housing offers a proven tool to address several challenges facing traditional construction, including slow timelines, high costs, supply chain disruptions, and labour shortages. Factory construction methods can significantly reduce build times, cut construction waste by up to 70 to 80 per cent, lower greenhouse gas emissions by up to 43 per cent, and bring project costs down by as much as 20 per cent.
While many local governments experience financial and resource constraints in promoting housing supply, they also have direct authority and influence over several barriers affecting housing delivery, including amending zoning bylaw requirements, streamlining development and permitting, and building public understanding and support. Despite the well-understood benefits of prefabricated housing, scaling the industry in BC is currently constrained by systemic barriers at all government levels. Common local government barriers to prefabricated housing include:
- Non-Harmonized Municipal Residential Zoning Requirements: Prefabricated housing depends on standardized, repeatable designs to reduce costs. Inconsistent municipal zoning rules (e.g., size, height, parking, siting) force builders to redesign projects for each community. This fragmentation reduces economies of scale, increases production and compliance costs, and raises housing prices while limiting supply.
- Lengthy Approval and Inspection Processes: Local building inspectors often lack experience with both permitting (plan checking) and inspecting factory-built modules. Zoning bylaws may restrict building types or require redundant hearings. These frictions reduce the time and cost advantages associated with prefabricated housing compared to other housing types.
- Public Perception: Some residents continue to associate prefabricated housing with older forms of manufactured housing or temporary trailers, despite significant advances in design, quality, durability, and energy performance. That stigma can reduce demand, contribute to neighbourhood opposition, and make some developers or lenders more cautious about supporting market-oriented prefabricated projects. It can also limit manufacturing into isolated, publicly subsidized projects because many developers avoid them for market housing, depriving factories of the predictable demand needed to lower costs through economies of scale.
Recommendations:
BC REALTORS® recommend prioritizing the following policy initiatives to reduce local barriers to scaling prefabricated housing solutions in BC:
- Update and harmonize zoning and permitting bylaws with nearby regional communities to make prefabricated housing easier for builders to replicate across municipal boundaries. If prefabricated housing can be expanded across more communities using the same or similar predictable, modular-inclusive requirements, it becomes more efficient to produce, standardize, and scale. This lowers the cost per unit and makes homes more affordable. As well, local governments should standardize and streamline permitting for transportation and installation of modular units through municipal roadways.
- Introduce “as-of-right” zoning for modular and prefabricated units and train planners and inspectors on modular compliance using CSA Group guidance. CSA Group develops nationally recognized standards that are often referenced by building codes, regulators, municipalities, and industry. Factory-built housing constructed under CSA A277 and CSA Z240 is subject to standardized manufacturing and quality-control processes, including third-party inspections. CSA A277 establishes a factory certification and quality assurance program that verifies prefabricated buildings are designed and constructed in accordance with the applicable codes and regulations, including the BC Building Code, where applicable. This certification process helps ensure consistent construction quality throughout manufacturing. Permitting processes for prefabricated housing must shift from the current linear approach, in which design, approvals, and construction occur sequentially, to a more integrated model that reflects how factory-built housing is actually produced. Key to this recommendation is expedited permitting for pre-approved modular designs.
- Pilot municipal modular projects and coordinate public tours to showcase quality and build public trust. Prefabricated and modular housing can be rapidly deployed through municipal identification of underused public lands. Local governments should engage residents in these projects through open houses and education campaigns to normalize modular and prefabricated housing in their communities.
Select another issue